Good





Directed by Vincente Amorim 
Written by C.P. Taylor and John Wrathall
Cast: Viggo Mortensen, Jason Isaacs, Jodie Whittaker
[2008]

“The safest road to hell is the gradual one - the gentle slope, soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, without signposts.” -C.S. Lewis 
Life is a sum of all your choices. -Albert Camus 
The scene is Germany in the 1930s.  John Halder (Viggo Mortensen) is a professor who has written a supposedly fictitious book supporting compassionate euthanasia. Thus far, he has discreetly avoided joining the National Socialist party. He quietly sighs when books are burned outside his classroom window, but does nothing to openly defy Nazism. Trouble comes in when Der Fehurer himself reads John’s novel. Hitler loves it. John is promised significant funds to continue his work, with only one catch: he must join the party. It is a polite command. 

Initially, the film promises to deal more with the subject of euthanasia. With brilliant subtly, euthanasia becomes a metaphor for Nazi ideology. Good becomes the story of one man’s slow downward descent into spiritual death. 
When he begins working for Hitler,  John witnesses the humanizing of euthanasia brought on partly by the success of his book. A commercial is shot where a young man gives a suicide pill to a beautiful young women in a silk nightgown, saying “this will help you sleep.” She breathes her last “I love you” and falls tenderly on his shoulder. Thus death (murder perhaps, the film doesn’t give a clear verdict) is glamorous, much like the Nazi propaganda that used euphemisms like “resettlement” and “camp.” 
In the end its all about conscience. There is always the indication that John Halder knows the difference between right and wrong.  At intervals throughout the movie, John imagines he hears music playing. We are left to wonder what this could mean.  In the beginning of the film, John says that music equals faith. In the end, the music was real. All along it pointed to a climatic crescendo, perhaps symbolizing goodness or moral universalism. Before realizing it is real, John hears the music three times: 1) when he first meets the women he would later leave his wife for, 2) when his euthanasia work is being praised, and 3) when he witnesses his own colleagues forcing Jewish Germans off to concentration camps. Perhaps the music symbolizes his conscience, because in the end, John realizes that true goodness does exist, and it is in the very heart of what he was helping to exterminate. 


The music could also represent John's moral reality. The movie takes place in the time span when John is tangibly caught between the dark side and the good side. The music signifies this unbalance. When John is at the "good" equilibrium, there is nothing out of place to trigger his conscience (i.e. what allows him to hear the music). But in the struggle to serve both good and evil, all of John's moral senses are unrooted. It is like jumping from a plane: there was sensory equilibrium in the plane and there will be equilibrium on the ground. The violent rush of wind that occurs while falling is like the conscientious war that precedes a moral choice. 

Throughout his life, little by little, John falls farther away from what is good.  Gradually, “right” or “good” becomes relative. It started with a simple paper. “Just join the party," they said. A second glance at his beautiful student named Alice (Jodie Whittaker) evolves into an affair. In time John is not just meeting with the Nazis over a beer, he is wearing their uniforms. 
At first it seems as though John can serve two masters. Although he joined the National Socialist party, he did not abandon his Jewish friend (a brilliantly sardonic Jason Isaacs). He writes a book on compassionate euthanasia and yet will not give into his sick mother’s pleas to end her misery. There comes a point though, when he has sold himself completely to one side. This happened not in a definitive moment, but through the succession of many small choices. 

Jason Isaacs (The Patriot, Harry Potter) adds strength and defiance to the convincing and realistic cast. Mortensen (The Lord of the Rings, The Road) makes the movie chilling: we feel that we could be in his place, weeping in astonishment at what we have done. He is gentle, kind, and caring. All his virtues remind us that no one is safe from making bad choices, and no amount of goodness can shield the evil that resides in every human’s heart. 


Thanks Dad for the help on this one. 

Age of Enchantment: the End of Harry Potter


As Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 swept the big screens on Friday, we learned once again that good triumphs over evil. When John Williams’ familiar soundtrack hailed the end credits, the film’s audience witnessed the conclusion of an era. If the final film leaves fans at all disappointed, it is because there was so much to live up to. 


“He'll be famous - a legend - I wouldn't be surprised if today was known as Harry Potter day in future - there will be books written about Harry - every child in our world will know his name!" (Professor McGonagall, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone) 
Harry hit U.S. bookstores in 1998
Shortly after the wild-haired little boy entered bookstores in 1997, he became a household name and went on to title one of the biggest franchises in entertainment history. There is no argument that author J.K. Rowling created an international phenomenon. The past thirteen years are being called the Era of Harry Potter. What does this mean then, for those who lived through the Potter Age? If I might borrow a phrase, it was the best of times and it was the worst of times. 
It was an age of enchantment. Rowling’s universe is not a wholly separate world like Middle-earth or Narnia. Instead, wizards, witches, goblins, house elves, and hippogriffs live undercover in secret pockets of the modern world. Protective spells cloak anything that might startle Muggles (those who lack magical abilities). Even with our ordinary world as the backdrop in the stories, Rowling creates an atmosphere of wonder that beckons readers into flickering candlelit halls and strange forests.  The school bullies and the drabness of homework are equally vivid. By marrying the everyday with the magical,  Rowling seems to admonish that real adventures happen outside the imagination, and real beauty and real danger are everywhere around us. 
Rowling’s creativity and literary prowess are enough to charm her readers. But while sales in round-rimmed glasses may be booming, but there are deeper truths under the wizard garb of Potter fandom. More important than their lessons in Herbology and Defense Against the Dark Arts are the lessons Harry and friends learn about friendship, sacrificial love, and virtue. These lessons are put to the test as the protagonists choose to defend what is good, even to the point of death. As the plot thickens and more complex themes unfold, characters and readers alike realize what it is they’re holding on to. 

2010 Quiddich World Cup in NYC
Further proving that the Boy Wizard’s influence can’t be contained on the printed page, the International Quidditch Association was established in 2007. The Rowling-created sport involving broomsticks and the ever-cunning gold Snitch has been adapted for Muggle athletes and can be played on college campuses across the globe. The fifth Quidditch World Cup is scheduled for November 12-13 in New York City. 

With a little magic,
Radcliffe is now the 5th
richest person under 30


The Harry Era was also an age of rising to fortune. As orphaned, mistreated Harry became the most famous and most hunted wizard in the magical world, J.K. Rowling ditched her welfare status for a net worth of $1 billion. Likewise, Daniel Radcliffe is now richer than Prince William due to his successful onscreen portrayal of the Boy Who Lived.  DH Part 2 boasted the highest-grossing opening day in box office lore, bringing in $92.1 million on July 15. The Gringotts Goblins would be proud. 

The success of the franchise has also cast an age of contention. Christians especially are wary of Harry and his fellow students at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Fear rose that the books promoted the use of sorcery. Christian leaders and parents continue to debate whether it is safe for kids to go around shouting “Expecto Patronum,” but that’s another saga. 
For those fans who literally grew up with Ron Weasley, Hermione Granger, Neville Longbottom, Draco Malfoy, and Harry Potter,  Deathly Hallows Part 2 marks the end of childhood. Gone is the age of camping out in bookstores draped in Gryffindor scarves. There will be no more predicting of future plots or anticipating midnight showings with wands at the ready. It is the end of a journey, but the best parts can still be enjoyed for generations.  




True Grit

Written/Directed by Joel and Ethan Coen
Starring: Jeff Bridges, Matt Damon, Josh Brolin, Hailee Steinfeld 


The Coen Brothers like to redeem the most unlikely people. Their characters are always believable, but seldom people you would want to be. The main characters of  O Brother, Where Art Thou? and Raising Arizona are both ex-convicts. In keeping, True Grit’s Rooster Cogburn (Jeff Bridges) is a one-eyed U.S. Marshall with a less than savory past. His life of bizarre showdowns and drunkenness is interrupted by a 14-year old girl on a mission. Maddie Ross (Hailee Steinfeld) wants picture-perfect revenge for her father’s killer, and she wants Rooster to help her see it done. 
Ethan and Joel Coen direct
When the movie first begins, it feels too slow and rambling. There is little to like in the gruff, carelessly violent Rooster, or the rather aloof Texas Ranger LeBeouf (Matt Damon). Even Maddie could seem like an annoying little girl who doesn’t know her place. But as the roads get tougher and the dangers nearer, all three characters emerge with an increasingly endearing display of grit that is not unlike the gradual and halting evolution of their own relationships. 

True Grit received ten Oscar nominations, including Best Director and Best Picture, yet the movie is anything but showy. Joel and Ethan Coen convey a sense of dusty sparseness that is both realistic and alien. They almost deglamorize the wild west. Everything about the movie flees sentimentality and emotion.  The only sense of intimacy we feel with the characters is during the moments of humor that flawlessly dot the script. All of this, including the formal speech (it is instead of it’s) used in the script seems to separate us from the characters, as if we are supposed to focus on something else.

What is beautiful about the film is that the central theme of revenge morphs inconspicuously into something like salvation. In saving Maddie’s life, we get the feeling that Rooster is trying to atone for his failures. The directors aptly capture the realism of such a story in the lack of a triumphant victory. There is nothing about the revenge in the end, it is about the friends made on the journey.  The film does not build into a neatly packaged climax or conclude with all the loose ends tied. The ending is abrupt and pragmatic, as if Maddie herself had written it; for as she says, “time just gets away from us.” So it does, and maybe the Coen Brothers are doing their best to focus on the things that are really worth the time we have.